The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
Grâce à l'analyse du modèle de Rayleigh, un modèle explicatif de l'effet qualité des évaluations par les pairs est construit. Les activités d'examen sont évaluées par le taux d'élimination des défauts à chaque phase. Nous avons émis des hypothèses sur la manière dont ces mesures sont liées à la qualité du produit. Ces hypothèses sont vérifiées par une analyse de régression des données réelles du projet et des formules de calcul concrètes sont obtenues comme modèle. En utilisant le mécanisme pour construire ce modèle, nous pouvons développer une méthode pour élaborer un plan d'examen concret et définir des valeurs objectives pour gérer les activités d'examen en cours.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copier
Mutsumi KOMURO, Norihisa KOMODA, "A Model to Explain Quality Improvement Effect of Peer Reviews" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information,
vol. E93-D, no. 1, pp. 43-49, January 2010, doi: 10.1587/transinf.E93.D.43.
Abstract: Through the analysis of Rayleigh model, an explanatory model for the quality effect of peer reviews is constructed. The review activities are evaluated by the defect removal rate at each phase. We made hypotheses on how these measurements are related to the product quality. These hypotheses are verified through regression analysis of actual project data, and concrete calculation formulae are obtained as a model. Making use of the mechanism to construct this model, we can develop a method for making concrete review plan and setting objective values to manage on-going review activities.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/information/10.1587/transinf.E93.D.43/_p
Copier
@ARTICLE{e93-d_1_43,
author={Mutsumi KOMURO, Norihisa KOMODA, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information},
title={A Model to Explain Quality Improvement Effect of Peer Reviews},
year={2010},
volume={E93-D},
number={1},
pages={43-49},
abstract={Through the analysis of Rayleigh model, an explanatory model for the quality effect of peer reviews is constructed. The review activities are evaluated by the defect removal rate at each phase. We made hypotheses on how these measurements are related to the product quality. These hypotheses are verified through regression analysis of actual project data, and concrete calculation formulae are obtained as a model. Making use of the mechanism to construct this model, we can develop a method for making concrete review plan and setting objective values to manage on-going review activities.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transinf.E93.D.43},
ISSN={1745-1361},
month={January},}
Copier
TY - JOUR
TI - A Model to Explain Quality Improvement Effect of Peer Reviews
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SP - 43
EP - 49
AU - Mutsumi KOMURO
AU - Norihisa KOMODA
PY - 2010
DO - 10.1587/transinf.E93.D.43
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SN - 1745-1361
VL - E93-D
IS - 1
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
Y1 - January 2010
AB - Through the analysis of Rayleigh model, an explanatory model for the quality effect of peer reviews is constructed. The review activities are evaluated by the defect removal rate at each phase. We made hypotheses on how these measurements are related to the product quality. These hypotheses are verified through regression analysis of actual project data, and concrete calculation formulae are obtained as a model. Making use of the mechanism to construct this model, we can develop a method for making concrete review plan and setting objective values to manage on-going review activities.
ER -