The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
Bien que de nombreuses études en génie logiciel aient été menées, il n’est pas clair si elles répondent aux besoins des praticiens du développement logiciel. Certaines études ont évalué l'efficacité de la recherche en génie logiciel par les praticiens, afin de clarifier que la recherche répond aux besoins des praticiens. Nous avons effectué une étude répétée d'eux, en recrutant des praticiens appartenant principalement à des PME (petites et moyennes entreprises) pour l'enquête. Nous avons demandé à 16 praticiens d'évaluer les études de pointe en génie logiciel présentées à l'ICSE 2016. Dans l'enquête, nous avons défini le point de vue de l'évaluation comme l'efficacité du propre travail du répondant. En conséquence, le ratio de réponses positives (c'est-à-dire que les réponses étaient supérieures à 2 sur une échelle de 5 points) était de 33.3 %, et le ratio était inférieur à celui des études précédentes. Le résultat n'était pas affecté par le nombre d'employés dans l'entreprise du répondant, mais serait affecté par le point de vue de l'évaluation.
Yukasa MURAKAMI
Kindai University
Masateru TSUNODA
Kindai University
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copier
Yukasa MURAKAMI, Masateru TSUNODA, "Replicated Study of Effectiveness Evaluation of Cutting-Edge Software Engineering" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information,
vol. E105-D, no. 1, pp. 21-25, January 2022, doi: 10.1587/transinf.2021MPL0002.
Abstract: Although many software engineering studies have been conducted, it is not clear whether they meet the needs of software development practitioners. Some studies evaluated the effectiveness of software engineering research by practitioners, to clarify the research satisfies the needs of the practitioners. We performed replicated study of them, recruiting practitioners who mainly belong to SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) to the survey. We asked 16 practitioners to evaluate cutting-edge software engineering studies presented in ICSE 2016. In the survey, we set the viewpoint of the evaluation as the effectiveness for the respondent's own work. As a result, the ratio of positive answers (i.e., the answers were greater than 2 on a 5-point scale) was 33.3%, and the ratio was lower than past studies. The result was not affected by the number of employees in the respondent's company, but would be affected by the viewpoint of the evaluation.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/information/10.1587/transinf.2021MPL0002/_p
Copier
@ARTICLE{e105-d_1_21,
author={Yukasa MURAKAMI, Masateru TSUNODA, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information},
title={Replicated Study of Effectiveness Evaluation of Cutting-Edge Software Engineering},
year={2022},
volume={E105-D},
number={1},
pages={21-25},
abstract={Although many software engineering studies have been conducted, it is not clear whether they meet the needs of software development practitioners. Some studies evaluated the effectiveness of software engineering research by practitioners, to clarify the research satisfies the needs of the practitioners. We performed replicated study of them, recruiting practitioners who mainly belong to SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) to the survey. We asked 16 practitioners to evaluate cutting-edge software engineering studies presented in ICSE 2016. In the survey, we set the viewpoint of the evaluation as the effectiveness for the respondent's own work. As a result, the ratio of positive answers (i.e., the answers were greater than 2 on a 5-point scale) was 33.3%, and the ratio was lower than past studies. The result was not affected by the number of employees in the respondent's company, but would be affected by the viewpoint of the evaluation.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transinf.2021MPL0002},
ISSN={1745-1361},
month={January},}
Copier
TY - JOUR
TI - Replicated Study of Effectiveness Evaluation of Cutting-Edge Software Engineering
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SP - 21
EP - 25
AU - Yukasa MURAKAMI
AU - Masateru TSUNODA
PY - 2022
DO - 10.1587/transinf.2021MPL0002
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SN - 1745-1361
VL - E105-D
IS - 1
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
Y1 - January 2022
AB - Although many software engineering studies have been conducted, it is not clear whether they meet the needs of software development practitioners. Some studies evaluated the effectiveness of software engineering research by practitioners, to clarify the research satisfies the needs of the practitioners. We performed replicated study of them, recruiting practitioners who mainly belong to SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) to the survey. We asked 16 practitioners to evaluate cutting-edge software engineering studies presented in ICSE 2016. In the survey, we set the viewpoint of the evaluation as the effectiveness for the respondent's own work. As a result, the ratio of positive answers (i.e., the answers were greater than 2 on a 5-point scale) was 33.3%, and the ratio was lower than past studies. The result was not affected by the number of employees in the respondent's company, but would be affected by the viewpoint of the evaluation.
ER -