The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
La gestion efficace de la mobilité est l’un des défis les plus importants des réseaux mobiles. Étant donné que l'itinérance entre les cellules sans fil peut entraîner une longue latence de transfert et une perte de paquets élevée, elle peut entraîner une mauvaise qualité de service pour les applications sensibles aux délais et pour les applications nécessitant une transmission fiable. Dans cet article, nous proposons un nouveau cadre de gestion transparente de la micro-mobilité pour Micro Mobile MPLS (appelé MiM-MPLS) afin de surmonter le problème de perte de paquets tout en maintenant une faible latence de transfert. De plus, nous proposons une combinaison de MiM-MPLS et du MPLS MFC-Micro Mobile existant [3],[4] (appelé MiM-MFC-MPLS) pour améliorer encore les performances de transfert. MiM-MPLS et MiM-MFC-MPLS fournissent des mécanismes de transfert efficaces grâce à l'utilisation de chemins de commutation d'étiquettes (LSP) préétablis, du déclencheur L2 et de l'enregistrement local. Les mécanismes de transfert pour les transferts intra (L2 et L3) et pour un transfert inter dans ces cadres sont décrits en détail. Les performances sont analysées en termes de coût de signalisation des mises à jour d'enregistrement, de latence de transfert, de perte de paquets, d'exigence de taille de tampon et de gigue de retard. Par rapport aux cadres de transfert existants, les résultats montrent que les MiM-MPLS et MiM-MFC-MPLS proposés ne peuvent fournir aucune perte de paquets tout en maintenant un faible coût de signalisation des mises à jour d'enregistrement, une latence de transfert et une gigue de retard au prix d'un certain espace tampon. En particulier, MiM-MFC-MPLS offre les meilleures performances de transfert (c'est-à-dire le coût de signalisation le plus bas en termes de mises à jour d'enregistrement, de latence de transfert et de gigue de retard) parmi tous les frameworks que nous avons considérés, au prix d'un certain espace tampon.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copier
Tubtim SANGUANWONGTHONG, Poompat SAENGUDOMLERT, Arnon TUBTIANG, "Seamless Mobility Mechanisms for Micro Mobile MPLS" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications,
vol. E92-B, no. 10, pp. 3143-3155, October 2009, doi: 10.1587/transcom.E92.B.3143.
Abstract: Efficient mobility management is one of the most important challenges in mobile networks. Since roaming between wireless cells can cause long handoff latency and high packet loss, it can result in poor quality of services for delay-sensitive applications and for applications requiring reliable transmission. In this paper, we propose a new seamless micro-mobility management framework for Micro Mobile MPLS (called MiM-MPLS) to overcome the packet loss problem while maintaining low handoff latency. In addition, we propose a combination of MiM-MPLS and the existing MFC-Micro Mobile MPLS [3],[4](called MiM-MFC-MPLS) to further enhance the handoff performance. MiM-MPLS and MiM-MFC-MPLS provide efficient handoff mechanisms through the use of pre-established Label Switched Paths (LSPs), the L2 trigger, and local registration. The handoff mechanisms for (L2 and L3) intra handoffs and for an inter handoff in these frameworks are described in detail. The performance is analyzed in terms of the signaling cost of registration updates, handoff latency, packet loss, buffer size requirement, and delay jitter. Compared to existing handoff frameworks, the results show that the proposed MiM-MPLS and MiM-MFC-MPLS can provide no packet loss while maintaining low signaling cost of registration updates, handoff latency, and delay jitter at the cost of some buffer space. In particular, MiM-MFC-MPLS has the best handoff performance (i.e., the lowest signaling cost of registration updates, handoff latency, and delay jitter) among all the frameworks that we considered at the cost of some buffer space.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/communications/10.1587/transcom.E92.B.3143/_p
Copier
@ARTICLE{e92-b_10_3143,
author={Tubtim SANGUANWONGTHONG, Poompat SAENGUDOMLERT, Arnon TUBTIANG, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications},
title={Seamless Mobility Mechanisms for Micro Mobile MPLS},
year={2009},
volume={E92-B},
number={10},
pages={3143-3155},
abstract={Efficient mobility management is one of the most important challenges in mobile networks. Since roaming between wireless cells can cause long handoff latency and high packet loss, it can result in poor quality of services for delay-sensitive applications and for applications requiring reliable transmission. In this paper, we propose a new seamless micro-mobility management framework for Micro Mobile MPLS (called MiM-MPLS) to overcome the packet loss problem while maintaining low handoff latency. In addition, we propose a combination of MiM-MPLS and the existing MFC-Micro Mobile MPLS [3],[4](called MiM-MFC-MPLS) to further enhance the handoff performance. MiM-MPLS and MiM-MFC-MPLS provide efficient handoff mechanisms through the use of pre-established Label Switched Paths (LSPs), the L2 trigger, and local registration. The handoff mechanisms for (L2 and L3) intra handoffs and for an inter handoff in these frameworks are described in detail. The performance is analyzed in terms of the signaling cost of registration updates, handoff latency, packet loss, buffer size requirement, and delay jitter. Compared to existing handoff frameworks, the results show that the proposed MiM-MPLS and MiM-MFC-MPLS can provide no packet loss while maintaining low signaling cost of registration updates, handoff latency, and delay jitter at the cost of some buffer space. In particular, MiM-MFC-MPLS has the best handoff performance (i.e., the lowest signaling cost of registration updates, handoff latency, and delay jitter) among all the frameworks that we considered at the cost of some buffer space.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transcom.E92.B.3143},
ISSN={1745-1345},
month={October},}
Copier
TY - JOUR
TI - Seamless Mobility Mechanisms for Micro Mobile MPLS
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SP - 3143
EP - 3155
AU - Tubtim SANGUANWONGTHONG
AU - Poompat SAENGUDOMLERT
AU - Arnon TUBTIANG
PY - 2009
DO - 10.1587/transcom.E92.B.3143
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SN - 1745-1345
VL - E92-B
IS - 10
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
Y1 - October 2009
AB - Efficient mobility management is one of the most important challenges in mobile networks. Since roaming between wireless cells can cause long handoff latency and high packet loss, it can result in poor quality of services for delay-sensitive applications and for applications requiring reliable transmission. In this paper, we propose a new seamless micro-mobility management framework for Micro Mobile MPLS (called MiM-MPLS) to overcome the packet loss problem while maintaining low handoff latency. In addition, we propose a combination of MiM-MPLS and the existing MFC-Micro Mobile MPLS [3],[4](called MiM-MFC-MPLS) to further enhance the handoff performance. MiM-MPLS and MiM-MFC-MPLS provide efficient handoff mechanisms through the use of pre-established Label Switched Paths (LSPs), the L2 trigger, and local registration. The handoff mechanisms for (L2 and L3) intra handoffs and for an inter handoff in these frameworks are described in detail. The performance is analyzed in terms of the signaling cost of registration updates, handoff latency, packet loss, buffer size requirement, and delay jitter. Compared to existing handoff frameworks, the results show that the proposed MiM-MPLS and MiM-MFC-MPLS can provide no packet loss while maintaining low signaling cost of registration updates, handoff latency, and delay jitter at the cost of some buffer space. In particular, MiM-MFC-MPLS has the best handoff performance (i.e., the lowest signaling cost of registration updates, handoff latency, and delay jitter) among all the frameworks that we considered at the cost of some buffer space.
ER -