The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
Le retard de transmission dans les communications audio est un obstacle bien connu à la fluidité des communications. Cependant, on ne sait pas quels types d’effets sont provoqués par de petits retards. Nous avons émis l'hypothèse que le léger retard dans les réponses de l'auditeur perturbe le « conditionnement verbal » du locuteur, où le comportement verbal du locuteur varie en fonction des réponses de l'auditeur. Nous avons examiné si les petits retards dans les réponses de l'auditeur perturbaient le conditionnement verbal du locuteur à l'aide d'une tâche d'apprentissage de la grammaire artificielle. Les résultats suggèrent qu'un délai de 300 ms perturbait le conditionnement verbal des participants bien qu'ils n'en soient pas suffisamment conscients.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copier
Hitoshi OHNISHI, Kaname MOCHIZUKI, "Effect of Small Transmission Delay on Human Behavior in Audio Communication" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications,
vol. E92-B, no. 3, pp. 1020-1022, March 2009, doi: 10.1587/transcom.E92.B.1020.
Abstract: Transmission delay in audio communications is a well-known obstacle to achieving smooth communication. However, it is not known what kinds of effects are caused by small delays. We hypothesized that the small delay in the listener's responses disturbs the speaker's "verbal conditioning," where the verbal behavior of the speaker varies in accordance with the listener's responses. We examined whether the small delays in the listener's responses disturb the speaker's verbal conditioning using an artificial-grammar learning task. The results suggested that a 300-ms delay disturbed the participants' verbal conditioning although they were not adequately aware of the delay.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/communications/10.1587/transcom.E92.B.1020/_p
Copier
@ARTICLE{e92-b_3_1020,
author={Hitoshi OHNISHI, Kaname MOCHIZUKI, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications},
title={Effect of Small Transmission Delay on Human Behavior in Audio Communication},
year={2009},
volume={E92-B},
number={3},
pages={1020-1022},
abstract={Transmission delay in audio communications is a well-known obstacle to achieving smooth communication. However, it is not known what kinds of effects are caused by small delays. We hypothesized that the small delay in the listener's responses disturbs the speaker's "verbal conditioning," where the verbal behavior of the speaker varies in accordance with the listener's responses. We examined whether the small delays in the listener's responses disturb the speaker's verbal conditioning using an artificial-grammar learning task. The results suggested that a 300-ms delay disturbed the participants' verbal conditioning although they were not adequately aware of the delay.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transcom.E92.B.1020},
ISSN={1745-1345},
month={March},}
Copier
TY - JOUR
TI - Effect of Small Transmission Delay on Human Behavior in Audio Communication
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SP - 1020
EP - 1022
AU - Hitoshi OHNISHI
AU - Kaname MOCHIZUKI
PY - 2009
DO - 10.1587/transcom.E92.B.1020
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SN - 1745-1345
VL - E92-B
IS - 3
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
Y1 - March 2009
AB - Transmission delay in audio communications is a well-known obstacle to achieving smooth communication. However, it is not known what kinds of effects are caused by small delays. We hypothesized that the small delay in the listener's responses disturbs the speaker's "verbal conditioning," where the verbal behavior of the speaker varies in accordance with the listener's responses. We examined whether the small delays in the listener's responses disturb the speaker's verbal conditioning using an artificial-grammar learning task. The results suggested that a 300-ms delay disturbed the participants' verbal conditioning although they were not adequately aware of the delay.
ER -