The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
Cet article présente une méthode simple pour comparer l'impédance d'un réseau secteur artificiel (AMN) avec la norme 16-1-2 du Comité international spécial sur les interférences radio (CISPR). Le circuit d'un analyseur de réseau vectoriel, qui est un instrument de mesure d'impédance, n'est pas idéal et les impédances mesurées incluent des incertitudes de mesure. Cependant, une analyse complète de l’incertitude n’est pas requise dans la méthode proposée. En comparant la relation relative entre l'impédance mesurée d'un AMN testé et l'impédance mesurée des étalons de transfert d'origine dont l'impédance est modélisée par l'impédance régulée dans la norme CISPR 16-1-2, la conformité à la norme peut être déterminée. L'amplitude et la phase de l'impédance d'un AMN peuvent être analysées indépendamment. Pour démontrer la méthode, nous l’appliquons à un AMN disponible dans le commerce. Le résultat de la comparaison s'avère équivalent au résultat basé sur une analyse d'incertitude complète, ce qui confirme que la méthode de comparaison proposée est réalisable.
Ryoko KISHIKAWA
National Institute of Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copier
Ryoko KISHIKAWA, "Simple Comparison Method for Impedance Measurement of Artificial Mains Network with CISPR 16-1-2 Standard" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications,
vol. E102-B, no. 2, pp. 345-350, February 2019, doi: 10.1587/transcom.2018EBP3094.
Abstract: This paper presents a simple method for comparing the impedance of an artificial mains network (AMN) with the International Special Committee on Radio Interference (CISPR) 16-1-2 standard. The circuit of a vector network analyzer, which is an impedance measurement instrument, is not ideal, and the measured impedances include measurement uncertainties. However, complete uncertainty analysis is not required in the proposed method. By comparing the relative relationship between the measured impedance of an AMN under test and the measured impedance of the original transfer standards whose impedance is modeled by the regulated impedance in the CISPR 16-1-2 standard, conformity to the standard can be determined. The magnitude and phase of the impedance of an AMN can be independently analyzed. To demonstrate the method, we apply it to a commercially available AMN. The comparison result is found to be equivalent to the result based on a complete uncertainty analysis, which confirms that the proposed comparison method is feasible.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/communications/10.1587/transcom.2018EBP3094/_p
Copier
@ARTICLE{e102-b_2_345,
author={Ryoko KISHIKAWA, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications},
title={Simple Comparison Method for Impedance Measurement of Artificial Mains Network with CISPR 16-1-2 Standard},
year={2019},
volume={E102-B},
number={2},
pages={345-350},
abstract={This paper presents a simple method for comparing the impedance of an artificial mains network (AMN) with the International Special Committee on Radio Interference (CISPR) 16-1-2 standard. The circuit of a vector network analyzer, which is an impedance measurement instrument, is not ideal, and the measured impedances include measurement uncertainties. However, complete uncertainty analysis is not required in the proposed method. By comparing the relative relationship between the measured impedance of an AMN under test and the measured impedance of the original transfer standards whose impedance is modeled by the regulated impedance in the CISPR 16-1-2 standard, conformity to the standard can be determined. The magnitude and phase of the impedance of an AMN can be independently analyzed. To demonstrate the method, we apply it to a commercially available AMN. The comparison result is found to be equivalent to the result based on a complete uncertainty analysis, which confirms that the proposed comparison method is feasible.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transcom.2018EBP3094},
ISSN={1745-1345},
month={February},}
Copier
TY - JOUR
TI - Simple Comparison Method for Impedance Measurement of Artificial Mains Network with CISPR 16-1-2 Standard
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SP - 345
EP - 350
AU - Ryoko KISHIKAWA
PY - 2019
DO - 10.1587/transcom.2018EBP3094
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SN - 1745-1345
VL - E102-B
IS - 2
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
Y1 - February 2019
AB - This paper presents a simple method for comparing the impedance of an artificial mains network (AMN) with the International Special Committee on Radio Interference (CISPR) 16-1-2 standard. The circuit of a vector network analyzer, which is an impedance measurement instrument, is not ideal, and the measured impedances include measurement uncertainties. However, complete uncertainty analysis is not required in the proposed method. By comparing the relative relationship between the measured impedance of an AMN under test and the measured impedance of the original transfer standards whose impedance is modeled by the regulated impedance in the CISPR 16-1-2 standard, conformity to the standard can be determined. The magnitude and phase of the impedance of an AMN can be independently analyzed. To demonstrate the method, we apply it to a commercially available AMN. The comparison result is found to be equivalent to the result based on a complete uncertainty analysis, which confirms that the proposed comparison method is feasible.
ER -